Goal-Directed Portfolio Insurance Strategies
Created by W.Langdon from
gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.8120
- @PhdThesis{Liao:thesis,
-
author = "Benjamin Penyang Liao",
-
title = "Goal-Directed Portfolio Insurance Strategies",
-
school = "Department of Information Management, National Central
University, NSYSU",
-
year = "2006",
-
address = "Taiwan",
-
month = jun,
-
keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming, forest
genetic programming, GDPI, implicit piecewise linear
GDPI strategy, piecewise nonlinear GDPI strategy,
piecewise linear GDPI strategy, goal-directed strategy,
Portfolio insurance strategy",
-
URL = "http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:88/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=87443004",
-
URL = "http://thesis.lib.ncu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search-c/getfile?URN=87443004&filename=87443004.pdf",
-
size = "120 pages",
-
abstract = "Traditional portfolio insurance (PI) strategy such as
constant proportion portfolio insurance (CPPI) only
considers the floor constraint but not the goal aspect.
There seems to be two contradictory risk-attitudes
according to different studies: low wealth risk
aversion and high wealth risk aversion. Although low
wealth risk aversion can be explained by the CPPI
strategy, high wealth risk aversion can not be
explained by CPPI. We argue that these contradictions
can be explained from two perspectives: the portfolio
insurance perspective and the goal-directed
perspective. This study proposes a goal-directed (GD)
strategy to express an investor's goal-directed trading
behaviour and combines this floor-less GD strategy with
the goal-less CPPI strategy to form a piecewise linear
goal-directed CPPI (GDCPPI) strategy. The piecewise
linear GDCPPI strategy shows that there is a wealth
position M at the intersection of the GD strategy and
CPPI strategy. This M position guides investors to
apply CPPI strategy or GD strategy depending on whether
the current wealth is less than or greater than M
respectively. In addition, we extend the piecewise
linear GDCPPI strategy to a piecewise nonlinear GDCPPI
strategy. Moreover, we extend the piecewise GDCPPI
strategy to the piecewise GDTIPP strategy by applying
the time invariant portfolio protection (TIPP) idea,
which allows variable floor and goal comparing to the
constant floor and goal for piecewise GDCPPI strategy.
Therefore, piecewise GDCPPI strategy and piecewise
GDTIPP strategy are two special cases of piecewise
goal-directed portfolio insurance (GDPI) strategies.
When building the piecewise nonlinear GDPI strategies,
it is difficult to preassign an explicit $M$ value when
the structures of nonlinear PI strategies and nonlinear
GD strategies are uncertain. To solve this problem, we
then apply the minimum function to build the piecewise
nonlinear GDPI strategies, which these strategies still
apply the $M$ concept but operate it in an implicit
way. Also, the piecewise linear GDPI strategies can
attain the same effect by applying the minimum function
to form implicit piecewise linear GDPI strategies. This
study performs some experiments to justify our
propositions for piecewise GDPI strategies: there are
nonlinear GDPI strategies that can outperform the
linear GDPI strategies and there are some data-driven
techniques that can find better linear GDPI strategies
than the solutions found by Brownian technique. The GA
and forest genetic programming (GP) are two data-drive
techniques applied in this study. This study applies
genetic algorithm (GA) technique to find better
piecewise linear GDPI strategy parameters than those
under Brownian motion assumption. This study adapts
traditional GP to a forest GP in order to generate
piecewise nonlinear GDPI strategies. The statistical
tests show that the GP strategy outperforms the GA
strategy which in turn outperforms the Brownian
strategy. These statistical tests therefore justify our
propositions.",
- }
Genetic Programming entries for
Benjamin Penyang Liao
Citations