Comparative Assessment of the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Programming Methods for the Prediction of Longitudinal Velocity Field around a Single Straight Groyne

Created by W.Langdon from gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.7615

@Article{journals/asc/SafarzadehZB17,

• author = "Akbar Safarzadeh and Amir Hossein Zaji and Hossein Bonakdari",
• title = "Comparative Assessment of the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Programming Methods for the Prediction of Longitudinal Velocity Field around a Single Straight Groyne",
• journal = "Applied Soft Computing",
• year = "2017",
• volume = "60",
• pages = "213--228",
• month = nov,
• keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming, groyne, artificial neural network, ANN, 3d flow field, separation zone, experimental study",
• ISSN = "1568-4946",
• bibdate = "2017-11-22",
• bibsource = "DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/asc/asc60.html#SafarzadehZB17",
• DOI = "doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.048",
• abstract = "In the present paper, three-dimensional flow fields around single straight groynes with various lengths have been discussed. The dataset of the flow field is measured in the laboratory using Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV). Then, the longitudinal velocity field is modelled using a novel hybrid method of Genetic Algorithm based artificial neural network (GAA) that has the ability to automatically adjust the number of hidden neurons. To investigate the proposed method's performance, the results of GAA is measured and compared with one of the most common genetic algorithm based prediction method, namely genetic programming (GP). It is concluded that that GAA model successfully simulates the complex velocity field, and both the velocity magnitudes and isovel shapes are well predicted by this model. The results show that GAA with RMSE of 0.1236 in test data has a significantly better performance than the GP model with RMSE of 0.2342. In addition, it was founded that the transverse coordinate of the measuring point (Y*) is the most important input variable.",

}

Genetic Programming entries for Akbar Safarzadeh Amir Hossein Zaji Hossein Bonakdari

Citations