Skip to main content

Is Genetic Programming “Human-Competitive”? The Case of Experimental Double Auction Markets

  • Conference paper
Book cover Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - IDEAL 2011 (IDEAL 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6936))

  • 1791 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, the performance of human subjects is compared with genetic programming in trading. Within a kind of double auction market, we compare the learning performance between human subjects and autonomous agents whose trading behavior is driven by genetic programming (GP). To this end, a learning index based upon the optimal solution to a double auction market problem, characterized as integer programming, is developed, and criteria tailor-made for humans are proposed to evaluate the performance of both human subjects and software agents. It is found that GP robots generally fail to discover the best strategy, which is a two-stage procrastination strategy, but some human subjects are able to do so. An analysis from the point of view of cognitive psychology further shows that the minority who were able to find this best strategy tend to have higher working memory capacities than the majority who failed to do so. Therefore, even though GP can outperform most human subjects, it is not “human-competitive” from a higher standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Smith, V.L.: An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior. Journal of Political Economy 70(2), 111–137 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Furuhata, M., Perrussel, L., Thévenin, J.-M., Zhang, D.: Experimental Market Mechanism Design for Double Auction. In: Nicholson, A., Li, X. (eds.) AI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5866, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Gjerstad, S.: The Strategic Impact of Pace in Double Auction Bargaining. In: IEDAS, http://129.3.20.41/eps/mic/papers/0304/0304001.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deshmukh, K., Goldberg, A.V., Hartline, J.D., Karlin, A.R.: Truthful and Competitive Double Auctions. In: Möhring, R.H., Raman, R. (eds.) ESA 2002. LNCS, vol. European Symposium on Algorithms, p. 361. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Rust, J., Miller, J., Palmer, R.: Behavior of Trading Automata in a Computerized Double Auction Market. In: Friedman, D., Rust, J. (eds.) Double Auction Markets: Theory, Institutions, and Laboratory Evidence. Addison Wesley, Redwood City (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rust, J., Miller, J., Palmer, R.: Characterizing Effective Trading Strategies: Insights from a Computerized Double Auction Tournament. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18, 61–96 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ariely, D., Norton, M.I.: Psychology and Experimental Economics: A Gap in Abstraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(6), 336–339 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, S.H., Tai, C.C., Yang, L.X., Shih, K.C.: The Significance of Working Memory Capacity in Double Auction Markets: Modeling, Simulation and Experiments. In: The 2011 Allied Social Sciences Association Meetings, January 6-9. Denver, Colorado (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, S.H., Yu, T.: Agents Learned, but Do We? Knowledge Discovery Using the Agent-based Double Auction Markets. Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. 6(1), 159–170 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Koza, J.R., Keane, A.M., Streeter, M.J., Mydlowec, W., Yu, J., Lanza, G.: Genetic Programming IV: Routine Human-Competitive Machine Intelligence. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Xia, M., Stallaert, J., Whinston, A.B.: Solving the Combinatorial Double Auction Problem. European Journal of Operational Research 164, 239–251 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., Yang, L.-X., Ecker, U.K.H.: A Working Memory Test Battery for MatLab. Behavior Research Methods 42(2), 571–585 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shu-Heng, C., Kuo-Chuan, S. (2011). Is Genetic Programming “Human-Competitive”? The Case of Experimental Double Auction Markets. In: Yin, H., Wang, W., Rayward-Smith, V. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - IDEAL 2011. IDEAL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6936. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23878-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23878-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23877-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23878-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics