Elsevier

Measurement

Volume 95, January 2017, Pages 367-376
Measurement

Formulation of shear strength of slender RC beams using gene expression programming, part II: With shear reinforcement

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.10.024Get rights and content

Highlights

  • GEP is employed for the formulation of the shear capacity of RC slender beams.

  • A simplified formula is obtained for the shear capacity of beams with stirrups.

  • The GEP model has a better performance than the ACI, EC2, CSA and NZS codes.

Abstract

In this study, a new variant of genetic programming, namely gene expression programming (GEP) is utilized to predict the shear strength of reinforced concrete (RC) beams with stirrups. The derived model relates the shear strength to mechanical and geometrical properties. The model is developed using a database containing 466 experimental test results gathered from the literature. Sensitivity and parametric analyses are performed for further verification of the model. The comparative study proves the superior performance of the GEP model compared to the expressions developed in several codes of practice.

Introduction

The flexural behavior of concrete elements is relatively well-recognized. This has resulted in establishing consistent expressions for the design of these elements in several codes of practice. Some studies have also been conducted to investigate the shear mechanism of concrete members over the last couple of decades. However, the shear transfer mechanisms in concrete elements are not as straightforward as the flexural behavior of these elements and still needs more studies. Most of the expressions provided in the current code provisions are mainly based on experimental studies. They indeed follow both the sectional and strut and tie model to predict the shear capacity of concrete beams and significantly vary from code to code which provides a wide range of factor of safety against failure. Understanding the mechanism of the shear transfer in concrete elements has always been challenging over the past decades. Extensive research has been carried out in this field.

Ritter [1] and Morsch [2] proposed the first analytical model, i.e., truss analogy, to calculate the shear capacity of a reinforced concrete beam. Many other researchers have also published other expressions to predict the shear capacity of concrete beams. However, most of the currents standard codes of practice are using semi-empirical formulations. Recent analytical methods of determining the shear capacity of reinforced concrete beams, including the disturbed stress field model (DSFM) [3], [4], modified compression field theory (MCFT) [5], [6], [7], and the softened truss model [9], [10] are mainly developed based on the truss model assumption. Recently, Arslan [11] proposed two different formulas for normal and high strength reinforced concrete beams with stirrups.

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been recently utilized in many fields including engineering (e.g. [12]). ANNs has the ability of self-organization and self-learning. They can efficiently employ the prior acquired knowledge to respond to the new set of information quickly and automatically. There have been some researches with the specific objective of applying ANNs to the evaluation of the shear strength of RC beams with shear reinforcement (e.g. [13]). The ANNs were shown to be a powerful tool for predicting the shear strength of concrete beams. Despite the acceptable performance of ANNs, there is no efficient procedure for the selection of structures of such networks. Hence, many experiments have to be performed to obtain an appropriate configuration. Also, ANNs do not usually give a definite function to calculate the outcome using the input values.

Genetic programming (GP) [14] is a new alternative approach to ANNs for the aim of nonlinear modeling. The major advantage of GP lies in its powerful ability to generate prediction equation. GP follows the principle of Darwinian natural selection for evolving the models. It is known as an extension of genetic algorithms (GAs). The main difference between these two approaches is that in GP the evolving programs (individuals) are parse trees rather than fixed-length binary strings. GP and its variants have successfully been applied to various kinds of structural engineering problems (e.g. [15], [16], [17]).

Different variants of GP have been proposed to improve the traditional GP [18]. Gene expression programming (GEP) [19] is a robust variant of GP. The traditional GP representation is based on the evaluation of a single tree (model) expression. GEP evolves computer programs of different sizes and shapes encoded in linear chromosomes of fixed length. Some of the GEP applications to concrete structures modeling include prediction of the strength of concrete under triaxial compression [20] and prediction of the compressive strength of high-performance concrete [21].

This study investigates the feasibility of using GEP for simulating the complex behavior of the shear capacity of RC beams with stirrups. A new relationship is developed between the shear strength and several influencing parameters using a database gathered from 55 experimental studies. A comparative study is further conducted between the results obtained by the proposed model and those of the building codes. The GEP model is developed based on reliable experimental results collected from the literature.

Section snippets

Shear strength mechanisms

To determine the maximum shear capacity of reinforced concrete beams, the shear strength of the stirrups should be added to those provided by the concrete shear capacity.

Gene expression programming

GP may be defined as a supervised machine learning technique that searches a program space instead of a data space. Symbolic regression is typically carried out through the standard GP to evolve a population of computer programs. The GP-based methods are substantially useful in cases where traditional methods are fairly complicated to be carried out, or the specific models of mathematical physics do not exist in detail. GEP is a natural development of GP first invented by Ferreira [19]. A basic

Model development

The primary objective of this paper is to develop a new formulation for the shear strength of slender RC beams with stirrups using the GEP approach. The GEP model was developed using six influencing input parameters as follows:V=fbw,d,fc,ρl,ρw,adwhere V (kN) is the shear strength of RC beam without stirrups, bw (mm) is the web width, d (mm) is the effective depth, a/d represents the shear span to depth ratio, fc (MPa) is the concrete compressive strength, ρl (%) shows the amount of longitudinal

Performance analysis and comparative study

According to Smith [80], if a model gives R > 0.8, and the error value is at the minimum, there is a strong correlation between the predicted and measured values. The model can, therefore, be judged as good. It can be observed from Fig. 4 and Table 3 that the GEP model with high R and low MAE and RMSE values precisely predicts the shear strength. The proposed model has both predictive ability (low MAE and RMSE values) and generalization performance (similar MAE and RMSEvalues) [81].

The proposed

Conclusions

In this study, a robust variant of GP, namely GEP is employed to assess the shear resistance of RC beam with stirrups. The shear strength was formulated in terms of several affecting factors (b, d, fc, a/d, ρl, ρw) representing the behavior of the shear strength. A widely dispersed database including both the HSC and NSC reinforced beams was used for the model development. It was observed that the GEP-based model is capable of predicting the shear strength of RC beam with stirrups to a high

References (84)

  • W. Ritter

    Die Bauweise Hennebique

    Schweiz. Bauzeitung

    (1899)
  • E. Morsch, Concrete Steel Construction, English Translation E.P.Goodrich, McGraw-Hill, New York, from 3rd edn of Der...
  • F.J. Vecchio

    Disturbed stress field model for reinforced concrete: formulation

    ASCE J. Struct. Eng.

    (2000)
  • F.J. Vecchio

    Disturbed stress field model for reinforced concrete: implementation

    ASCE J. Struct. Eng.

    (2001)
  • E.C. Bentz et al.

    Development of the 2004 CSA A23.3 shear provisions for reinforced concrete

    Can. J. Civ. Eng.

    (2005)
  • F.J. Vecchio et al.

    The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear

    J. Am. Concr. Inst.

    (1986)
  • F.J. Vecchio et al.

    Predicting the response of reinforced concrete beams subjected to shear using the modified compression field theory

    ACI Struct. J.

    (1988)
  • S.T. Mau et al.

    Shear strength prediction for deep beams with web reinforcement

    Struct. J. Am. Concr. Inst.

    (1987)
  • X.B. Pang et al.

    Behavior of reinforced concrete membrane elements in shear

    Struct. J. Am. Concr. Inst.

    (1995)
  • G. Arslan

    Shear strength of reinforced concrete beams with stirrups

    Mater. Struct.

    (2008)
  • J.A. Abdallaa et al.

    Modeling and simulation of shear resistance of R/C beams using artificial neural network

    J. Franklin Inst.

    (2007)
  • J. Koza

    Genetic Programming, on the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection

    (1992)
  • A.H. Gandomi et al.

    A linear genetic programming application to CFRP confined concrete cylinders

    Mater. Struct.

    (2010)
  • A.H. Gandomi et al.

    Expression programming techniques for formulation of structural engineering systems

  • C. Ferreira

    Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems

    Complex Syst.

    (2001)
  • A.H. Gandomi et al.

    A novel approach to strength modeling of concrete under triaxial compression

    J. Mater. Civil Eng. – ASCE

    (2012)
  • American Concrete Institute, ACI Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete, ACI 318-02,...
  • Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings, Brussels,...
  • CSA, Design of Concrete Structures A23.3-94, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario,...
  • NZS 3101, the Design of Concrete Structures. Part 1, New Zealand Standards, Wellington,...
  • C. Ferreira

    Gene Expression Programming: Mathematical Modeling by an Artificial Intelligence

    (2006)
  • GEPSOFT. GeneXproTools. Version 4.0. Available online; 2006,...
  • P. Adebar et al.

    Shear strength of members without transverse reinforcement

    Can. J. Civ. Eng.

    (1996)
  • S.H. Ahmad et al.

    Shear strength of reinforced lightweight concrete beams of normal and high strength concrete

    Mag. Concr. Res.

    (1994)
  • N.S. Anderson et al.

    Detailing of stirrup reinforcement

    ACI Struct. J.

    (1989)
  • D. Angelakos et al.

    Effect of concrete strength and minimum stirrups on shear strength of large members

    ACI Struct. J.

    (2001)
  • F. Bach, M.P. Nielson, MW. Braestrup, Shear tests on reinforced concrete T-beams series V, U, X, B and S. Structural...
  • B. Bresler et al.

    Shear strength of reinforced concrete beams

    ACI J. Proc.

    (1963)
  • L.M. Cerruti et al.

    Staggered shear design of concrete beams: large scale tests

    Can. J. Civ. Eng.

    (1987)
  • A.P. Clark

    Diagonal tension in reinforcedconcrete beams

    ACI J. Proc.

    (1951)
  • M.P. Collins et al.

    How safe are our large, lightly reinforced concrete beams, slabs and footings?

    ACI Struct. J.

    (1999)
  • S.Y. Debaiky et al.

    Behavior and strength of reinforced haunched beams using high strength concrete

    ACI J. Proc.

    (1982)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Prediction of moment redistribution capacity in reinforced concrete beams using gene expression programming

      2023, Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gene expression programming (GEP) is one of the soft computing modelling tool that has been frequently used in many civil engineering studies to predict mathematical relations based on experimental studies as an efficient alternative to traditional regression. There are many studies in the literature performed on RC beams using GEP such as, prediction of flexural strength for beams reinforced with FRP bars [8], proposing a formulation for shear strength of slender RC beams [9], and proposing a model for shear strength of steel fibers RC beams [10]. However, in the literature review, it is not available any study regarding the determination of the moment redistribution with the GEP model.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text