Skip to main content

Co-Evolving Line Drawings with Hierarchical Evolution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Artificial Life and Computational Intelligence (ACALCI 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10142))

Abstract

We use an adversarial approach inspired by biological coevolution to generate complex line drawings without human guidance. Artificial artists and critics work against each other in an iterative competitive framework, forcing each to become increasingly sophisticated to outplay the other. Both the artists and critics are implemented in hercl, a framework combining linear and stack-based Genetic Programming, which is well suited to coevolution because the number of competing agents is kept small while still preserving diversity. The aesthetic quality of the resulting images arises from the ability of the evolved hercl programs, making judicious use of register adjustments and loops, to produce repeated substructures with subtle variations, in the spirit of low-complexity art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Blair, A.: Learning the Caesar and Vigenere Cipher by hierarchical evolutionary re-combination. In: Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 605–612 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blair, A.D.: Transgenic evolution for classification tasks with HERCL. In: Chalup, S.K., Blair, A.D., Randall, M. (eds.) ACALCI 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8955, pp. 185–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14803-8_15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colton, C.: Stroke matching for paint dances. In: International Symposium on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Datta, R., Joshi, D., Li, J., Wang, J.Z.: Studying aesthetics in photographics images using a computational approach. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 288–301 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galanter, P.: Computational aesthetic evaluation: past and future. In: McCormack, J., d’Inverno, M. (eds.) Computers and Creativity, pp. 255–293. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., Bengio, Y.: Generative adversarial nets. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2672–2680 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kowaliw, T., Dorin, A., McCormack, J.: Promoting creative design in interactive evolutionary computation. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 16(4), 523 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, Y., Hu, C.-J.: Aesthetic learning in an interactive evolutionary art system. In: Chio, C., et al. (eds.) EvoApplications 2010. LNCS, vol. 6025, pp. 301–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12242-2_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Machado, P., Romero, J., Manaris, B.: Experiments in computational aesthetics: an iterative approach to stylistic change in evolutionary art. In: Romero, J., Machado, P. (eds.) The Art of Artificial Evolution, pp. 381–415. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Saunders, R., Gero, J.S.: Artificial creativity: a synthetic approach to the study of creative behaviour. Comput. Cogn. Models Creat. Des. V, 113–139 (2001). Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition. University of Sydney, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidhuber, J.: Low-complexity art. Leonardo, J. Int. Soc. Arts Sci. Technol. 30(2), 97–103 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Secretan, J., Beato, N., D’Ambrosio, D.B., Rodriguez, A., Campbell, A., Folsom-Kovarik, J.T., Stanley, K.O.: Picbreeder: a case study in collaborative evolutionary exploration of design space. Evol. Comput. 19(3), 373–403 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Blair .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vickers, D., Soderlund, J., Blair, A. (2017). Co-Evolving Line Drawings with Hierarchical Evolution. In: Wagner, M., Li, X., Hendtlass, T. (eds) Artificial Life and Computational Intelligence. ACALCI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10142. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51691-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51691-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51690-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51691-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics